The Unified Web Evaluation Methodology (UWEM) 1.2 for WCAG 1.0
نویسندگان
چکیده
Checking of web accessibility can be carried out in several ways along the same international standards. The evaluation methodologies used by evaluation and certification organizations in several European countries (such as AccessiWeb in France, Technosite in Spain and AnySurfer in Belgium) are different in subtle but meaningful ways, even though they are usually based on the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 (WCAG 1.0). The Unified Web Evaluation Methodology (UWEM) is developed by European expert organisations and offers test descriptions to evaluate WCAG 1.0 conformance covering level AA, a clear sampling scheme, several reporting options, including score cards and other instruments to help communicate the results of evaluations. The aim is to establish the UWEM as the basis for web accessibility evaluation, policy support and possible certification in Europe.
منابع مشابه
E-Government Web Accessibility: WCAG 1.0 versus WCAG 2.0 Compliance
Most e-governments have traditionally used version 1.0 of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) as a basis to ensure that their websites are accessible by people with disabilities. This was reflected in their design guidelines, accessibility evaluations, policy-making and legislations. Recently, WCAG 2.0 emerged as an ISO/IEC International accessibility standard that has been recommen...
متن کاملA preliminary feedback for the WCAG 2.0 : WCAG 1.0 Vs WCAG 2.0 evaluation study
This paper aims at giving some feedback about the usability of the very recently released second version of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG 2.0). This is done by examining a Web page and evaluating it with both WCAG 1.0 and WCAG 2.0 and commenting upon the results obtained and noting how this reflects upon the content and usability of WCAG 2.0. The outcome of this exercise offers...
متن کاملEarly Results from Automatic Accessibility Benchmarking of Publ
Benchmarking of web accessibility is performed throughout Europe, to assess and raise awareness of web accessibility. The evaluation is often based on manual assessments with a high cost and with long intervals. The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines from W3C/WAI are the basis of most evaluations. Although the same guidelines are used, a range of different evaluation methodologies and scoring...
متن کاملWCAG 1.0 versus WCAG 2.0 Web Accessibility Compliance: A Case Study
Most e-governments have been using the WCAG 1.0 guidelines as reference to probe their compliance to web accessibility principles. This was reflected in their local accessibility policies, website design, maintenance, and accessibility testing activities. Recently, WCAG 2.0 emerged as an ISO/IEC 40500:2012 International accessibility standard that has been recommended for adoption by the W3C WA...
متن کاملمقایسۀ کاربرد انواع روشهای ارزیابی دسترسپذیری وبسایتها مطالعۀ موردی: وبسایت وزارتخانههای دولت جمهوری اسلامی ایران)
Purpose: The present research aims to comparatively study different methods for evaluating the accessibility of websites and analyze the results of case study concerning websites of ministries of Iranian government, in order to indicate the strengths, weaknesses, and differences in evaluation findings by applying each of website accessibility methods. Methodology: In this paper, initially the ...
متن کامل