The Unified Web Evaluation Methodology (UWEM) 1.2 for WCAG 1.0

نویسندگان

  • Annika Nietzio
  • Christophe Strobbe
  • Eric Velleman
چکیده

Checking of web accessibility can be carried out in several ways along the same international standards. The evaluation methodologies used by evaluation and certification organizations in several European countries (such as AccessiWeb in France, Technosite in Spain and AnySurfer in Belgium) are different in subtle but meaningful ways, even though they are usually based on the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 (WCAG 1.0). The Unified Web Evaluation Methodology (UWEM) is developed by European expert organisations and offers test descriptions to evaluate WCAG 1.0 conformance covering level AA, a clear sampling scheme, several reporting options, including score cards and other instruments to help communicate the results of evaluations. The aim is to establish the UWEM as the basis for web accessibility evaluation, policy support and possible certification in Europe.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

E-Government Web Accessibility: WCAG 1.0 versus WCAG 2.0 Compliance

Most e-governments have traditionally used version 1.0 of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) as a basis to ensure that their websites are accessible by people with disabilities. This was reflected in their design guidelines, accessibility evaluations, policy-making and legislations. Recently, WCAG 2.0 emerged as an ISO/IEC International accessibility standard that has been recommen...

متن کامل

A preliminary feedback for the WCAG 2.0 : WCAG 1.0 Vs WCAG 2.0 evaluation study

This paper aims at giving some feedback about the usability of the very recently released second version of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG 2.0). This is done by examining a Web page and evaluating it with both WCAG 1.0 and WCAG 2.0 and commenting upon the results obtained and noting how this reflects upon the content and usability of WCAG 2.0. The outcome of this exercise offers...

متن کامل

Early Results from Automatic Accessibility Benchmarking of Publ

Benchmarking of web accessibility is performed throughout Europe, to assess and raise awareness of web accessibility. The evaluation is often based on manual assessments with a high cost and with long intervals. The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines from W3C/WAI are the basis of most evaluations. Although the same guidelines are used, a range of different evaluation methodologies and scoring...

متن کامل

WCAG 1.0 versus WCAG 2.0 Web Accessibility Compliance: A Case Study

Most e-governments have been using the WCAG 1.0 guidelines as reference to probe their compliance to web accessibility principles. This was reflected in their local accessibility policies, website design, maintenance, and accessibility testing activities. Recently, WCAG 2.0 emerged as an ISO/IEC 40500:2012 International accessibility standard that has been recommended for adoption by the W3C WA...

متن کامل

مقایسۀ کاربرد انواع روش‎های ارزیابی دسترس‎پذیری وب‎سایت‎ها مطالعۀ موردی: وب‎سایت وزارتخانه‌های دولت جمهوری اسلامی ایران)

Purpose: The present research aims to comparatively study different methods for evaluating the accessibility of websites and analyze the results of case study concerning websites of ministries of Iranian government, in order to indicate the strengths, weaknesses, and differences in evaluation findings by applying each of website accessibility methods. Methodology: In this paper, initially the ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2008